Comments on: Hangeul Documentation Project

By: Bluesoju

Bluesoju — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:29:49 +0000

Yeah I’ve noticed some browser automatically allow unicode characters while others don’t. This was a problem when I tried linking people to the a specific wiki article that contained a korean character in the url.

By: mstrum

mstrum — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:22:09 +0000

@Jay Yeah, it must have something to do with the browser or something. Thanks for telling me about that, I've added that link into the post.

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:10:25 +0000

Yes, second one works. But first one is not working. it’s a little weird. lol

By: mstrum

mstrum — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:52:48 +0000

@Jay When I click that link, I get to the ㄱ page. Try clicking this link: http://www.koreanwikiproject.com/wiki/index.php?title=%E3%84%B1. Does this one work?

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:41:18 +0000

http://www.koreanwikiproject.com/wiki/index.php?title=ㄱ –> This is not the ㄱ page. I can see only [ ? ].

By: mstrum

mstrum — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:53:46 +0000

@Jay What do you mean? I meant to link to the ㄱ page. Is it not working for you?

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:43:16 +0000

http://www.koreanwikiproject.com/wiki/index.php?title=ㄱ –> wrong link, matt.

By: mstrum

mstrum — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:44:53 +0000

@Chris in South Korea That page is meant to be comprehensive. The smaller page is in the Learning Hangeul section. Before creating the smaller tutorials, we're going through a depth approach so we know exactly what to include in the learning section. Thanks for the feedback, I've added a link to help beginners know they shouldn't try to read that page.

By: Chris in South Korea

Chris in South Korea — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:46:14 +0000

WOW – a LOT of information on the ㄱ page – almost overwhelming in nature. Perhaps a ‘primer’ page with all of the basics on one page would work better, leaving the many sound clips for the more advanced (or interested) students. To be honest, I would find it all a little intimidating under this method – but it is comprehensive.